Re: Extra Terrestrials

From: John Mikes <jamikes.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:22:10 -0400

James, you misunderstood my incorrect sentence:
You wrote:
"> Yes, but if I want to talk like a flatlander, I can talk to my
girlfriend, not use this list<"
upon my note (Friday, 11 August, 2000: > >"Fine. *We* are still IN the
framework of thinking in human terms,
> > circumstances, logic, even in QS. Remember Flatland"? > >")
What I meant is really a general "we", the list, standing for
"You" and the ET discussion partners on the list. Not "me".
All the circumstances considered are in a Flatlandish mood of thinking,
human logic, even if one wants to be "free". So, you may talk to your
girlfriend, but on this list I see "human" implications posited upon ET
discussions.
That is what I wanted to point out.
John Mikes
<jamikes.domain.name.hidden>
"http://pages.prodigy.net/jamikes"



----- Original Message -----
From: "Higgo James" <james.higgo.domain.name.hidden>
To: "'John Mikes'" <jamikes.domain.name.hidden>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 4:24 AM
Subject: RE: Extra Terrestrials


> Yes, but if I want to talk like a flatlander, I can talk to my girlfriend,
not use this list
>
Received on Mon Aug 14 2000 - 06:25:27 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST