Jacques Mallah wrote:
>
> --- Russell Standish <R.Standish.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> > As has been previously mentioned, the RSSA is simply
> > measure conditional upon the observer being who
> > it/he/she is.
>
> > > The "RSSA values" can't be used because there
> > > isn't any way to compare *different* observers in
> > > the RSSA.
> >
> > I would not be so sure about this!
>
> See the first quote. How do you reconcile that?
I'm not so convinced there is a conflict. Perhaps you'd like to
demonstrate it.
>
> > > BTW, don't think that just because we're
> > > discussing on this thread, you're off the hook
> > > with respect to my point on the other thread that
> > > Bayesian reasoning is the same as the ASSA.
> >
> > What rot! Bayesian reasoning underpins both systems.
> > The real difference between them is whether one
> > accepts the concept of history.
>
> The real difference is that you refuse, by some
> trick of doublethink, to apply Bayesian reasoning to
> age and across different observers.
>
I seem to remember spending several weeks in fierce debate with you
doing precisely this.
> =====
> - - - - - - -
> Jacques Mallah (jackmallah.domain.name.hidden)
> Physicist / Many Worlder / Devil's Advocate
> "I know what no one else knows" - 'Runaway Train', Soul Asylum
> My URL: http://hammer.prohosting.com/~mathmind/
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
> http://photos.yahoo.com
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965
Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre
http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sun Jun 04 2000 - 16:38:03 PDT