--- Russell Standish <R.Standish.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> As has been previously mentioned, the RSSA is simply
> measure conditional upon the observer being who
> it/he/she is.
> > The "RSSA values" can't be used because there
> > isn't any way to compare *different* observers in
> > the RSSA.
>
> I would not be so sure about this!
See the first quote. How do you reconcile that?
> > BTW, don't think that just because we're
> > discussing on this thread, you're off the hook
> > with respect to my point on the other thread that
> > Bayesian reasoning is the same as the ASSA.
>
> What rot! Bayesian reasoning underpins both systems.
> The real difference between them is whether one
> accepts the concept of history.
The real difference is that you refuse, by some
trick of doublethink, to apply Bayesian reasoning to
age and across different observers.
=====
- - - - - - -
Jacques Mallah (jackmallah.domain.name.hidden)
Physicist / Many Worlder / Devil's Advocate
"I know what no one else knows" - 'Runaway Train', Soul Asylum
My URL:
http://hammer.prohosting.com/~mathmind/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com
Received on Sat Jun 03 2000 - 10:25:34 PDT