Re: Natural selection (spinoff from "History-less observer moments")

From: Russell Standish <R.Standish.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 15:17:22 +1000 (EST)

GSLevy.domain.name.hidden wrote:
> Great Fred, I had exactly the same thought. The selection of ideas, just like
> the selection of life forms, does not have to follow Occam. Otherwise we
> would still be slime in the mud.
>
> Anthropic selection is yet another kind of selection.
>
> While natural selection (selection of the individual by the world) is 3rd
> person effect, anthropy (selection of the world by the individual) is a 1st
> person effect. They are identical except that the frame of reference is
> different.

Interesting. This is exactly what I assert in my "Evolution in the
Multiverse"
paper. (http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks/pubs.html). Any comments
on that paper would be appreciated.

                                                Cheers


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965
Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu May 18 2000 - 22:15:31 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST