Re: Proof/insistance of multiverse/plenitude?

From: Hal Ruhl <hjr.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 22:44:29 -0400

I agree with Russell. In my case my basis for belief in the Plenitude is
as an aspect of the incompleteness of formal logic systems.

While I am currently revising my thesis presentation so that Russell and
others can more easily understand what I am trying to say, my strong
belief is based on my rather completely unexpected arrival at the existence
of the Plenitude [what I called the superverse] from the starting point of
research in the dynamics of sociolegal systems.

If my logic along this path is good then I find discussion of the Plenitude
essential to the entire scope of human endeavor.

My resulting position into which I am currently forced by my model is that
if the idea of the Plenitude [superverse] is found non viable then the
entire range of our logic is suspect.

Hal







>The simplest answer to this question is that this email list is
>dedicated to discussing this idea (of the plenitude). If we wanted to
>discuss the politics of desexing cats, we'd be involved in a different
>email group.
>
>There is currently no proof/evidence either for or against this
>idea. Its attraction is one of its compelling explanatory power. By
>discussing the consequences of this and related ideas, we might
>stumble across a logical contradiction in it, or even a means of
>testing it.
>
>Therefore, you are welcome to present compelling arguments against
>this idea - we don't treat it as unassailable dogma.
>
> Cheers
>
>Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> >
> > First, let me state that I am not a scientist that deals
> > with this stuff -- so please forgive me if I seem
> > naive or non-technical... but I have a question:
> >
> > Why are some people so adament about a "plenitude" or
> > a "multiverse" ... what proof is there that is so
> > convincing that the defenders of this faith are
> > unwilling to discuss anything else?
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: 2.6.2
> >
> > iQCVAwUBORpvWlpGPE+AF6qBAQEJrAQAkREGtCtxhYPHLuxWCDnrDQAG+GtA5Ypq
> > t7n98XosZwaPVxbYUWQ7I4tU1raiIVD6kkK0b0drqTDQtlUUUkCYacBN23GX0/k5
> > vcOzHkqMj4YCddsipS3NdFq+5zUyf0bdPPL7nWFyC3Byw8bL1WQDBH8xD5TpvVd9
> > khGtm0Ozd+g=
> > =1B50
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Dr. Russell Standish Director
>High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967
>UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965
>Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
>Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri May 12 2000 - 19:40:34 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:06 PST