James Higgo wrote:
> Jacques is right: there is no first person, so the distinction is spurious.
> 'you' have no 'future' so it's meaningless to try to predict it
Surely, the idea that 'you' have a somewhat 'predictable future' exists
in a different (more
'meaningful') sense from its antithesis?
Fred
Received on Thu May 11 2000 - 20:43:31 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:06 PST