Others will have to speak for themselves, but for my part I give reasons why
I consider that an AUH (ie more-or-less a plenitude) is the only
substantially reasonable explanation for our world in
http://www.physica.freeserve.co.uk/p101.htm
and subsequent links. I don't mind discussing other possible reasonable
approaches (and have often done so), but most of these are of course
'off-topic' as far as this list is concerned.
Alastair
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott D. Yelich <scott.domain.name.hidden>
To: <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
Sent: 11 May 2000 09:29
Subject: Proof/insistance of multiverse/plenitude?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
> First, let me state that I am not a scientist that deals
> with this stuff -- so please forgive me if I seem
> naive or non-technical... but I have a question:
>
> Why are some people so adament about a "plenitude" or
> a "multiverse" ... what proof is there that is so
> convincing that the defenders of this faith are
> unwilling to discuss anything else?
>
> Scott
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
>
> iQCVAwUBORpvWlpGPE+AF6qBAQEJrAQAkREGtCtxhYPHLuxWCDnrDQAG+GtA5Ypq
> t7n98XosZwaPVxbYUWQ7I4tU1raiIVD6kkK0b0drqTDQtlUUUkCYacBN23GX0/k5
> vcOzHkqMj4YCddsipS3NdFq+5zUyf0bdPPL7nWFyC3Byw8bL1WQDBH8xD5TpvVd9
> khGtm0Ozd+g=
> =1B50
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Received on Thu May 11 2000 - 14:05:00 PDT