>
> Hi Worlder,
>
> I continue to read the mails but I'm really overwhelmed to
> participate actively.
>
> Nevertheless I want you to know I've realised that OCCAM razor
> is not enough to eliminate completely the use of the
> movie graph argument (or Maudlin's Olympia) to get the
> complete reversal.
>
> Strictly speaking, the UDA shows only
>
> COMP + OCCAM => REVERSAL or LITTLENESS
>
> where LITTLENESS is the existence of a little concrete universe,
> and little means not big enough to run the complete UD.
However, surely LITTLENESS is contradicted by observation. We live in
a universe big enough to run the UD. Or have I missed something here?
>
> So I was right in my thesis not to use Occam, but the movie
> graph instead.
>
> I guess you have seen that!
>
> Bye,
>
> Bruno
>
> PS If you believe OCCAM is incompatible with LITTLENESS, the
> the UDA is enough. (But logically that is not obvious).
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit,
University of NSW Phone 9385 6967
Sydney 2052 Fax 9385 6965
Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre
http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu Mar 30 2000 - 18:54:25 PST