Re: Dreaming On

From: Flammarion <>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 04:04:14 -0700 (PDT)

On 1 Sep, 11:56, Bruno Marchal <> wrote:
> On 01 Sep 2009, at 10:49, Flammarion wrote:
> > Can't matter have processes?
> But in that line of discussion, the question should be: can primary
> matter have processes. You said yourself that primary matter is
> propertyless. How something without property can implement processes,
> with or without qualia?

PM has no essential properties, but is the bearer of all
otther properties. It can implement a computation in just
the same way it can be red. (Althoguh the combinatin PM+red
is of course not PM. It is only PM as a bare substrate).

> I begin to think that your primary matter is even incompatible with
> physicalism.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Tue Sep 01 2009 - 04:04:14 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:16 PST