On 1 Sep, 11:56, Bruno Marchal <marc....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> On 01 Sep 2009, at 10:49, Flammarion wrote:
>
> > Can't matter have processes?
>
> But in that line of discussion, the question should be: can primary
> matter have processes. You said yourself that primary matter is
> propertyless. How something without property can implement processes,
> with or without qualia?
PM has no essential properties, but is the bearer of all
otther properties. It can implement a computation in just
the same way it can be red. (Althoguh the combinatin PM+red
is of course not PM. It is only PM as a bare substrate).
> I begin to think that your primary matter is even incompatible with
> physicalism.
!!!!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Sep 01 2009 - 04:04:14 PDT