On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Flammarion<peterdjones.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11 Aug, 16:38, David Nyman <david.ny....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>> 2009/8/11 Rex Allen <rexallen....domain.name.hidden>:
>
>> Standard physicalism, on the other hand, by banishing self-access from
>> its fundamental notions of causal adequacy (though arrogating the
>> right to whisk a mysteriously powerless ghost of it back later by
>> sleight of intuition) is clearly false (incomplete is the more politic
>> term).
>
>
> Why can't self-access be existent but non-fundamental?
>
Because in that case self-access is just a term of convenience for the
more fundamental processes.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Mon Aug 31 2009 - 14:18:14 PDT