On 11 Aug, 16:38, David Nyman <david.ny....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Rex Allen <rexallen....domain.name.hidden>:
> Standard physicalism, on the other hand, by banishing self-access from
> its fundamental notions of causal adequacy (though arrogating the
> right to whisk a mysteriously powerless ghost of it back later by
> sleight of intuition) is clearly false (incomplete is the more politic
> term).
Why can't self-access be existent but non-fundamental?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Mon Aug 31 2009 - 11:10:19 PDT