Brian,
I started to read the text and found the 1st sentence:
*"In modern cosmology, a **multiverse is defined to be a collection of
possible physical universes"*
that pissed me off: 'possible' in our today's sense includes many
'impossibilities' in the sense of a mindset of 1000 years ago and I assume
does NOT include lots of 'possibles' in the scientific(?) mindset 1000 years
hence.
I find the position a 'present-day restricted' reductionist approach
adjusted into our 2009(or earlier?) cognitive inventory of physics.
In rigorous science I could not do better, but is it a position you would
really deem a "a very interesting read"?
JohnM
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Brian Tenneson <tennesb.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
> If it lives up to its abstract, it will be a very interesting read.
>
> ronaldheld wrote:
> > http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0907/0907.0216v1.pdf
> > comments?
> > >
> >
> >
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Jul 02 2009 - 10:50:53 PDT