Hi,
I was thinking about the movie graph and its conclusions. It concludes that
it is absurd for the connsciousness to supervene on the movie hence physical
supervenience is false.
But if I simulate the graph with a program, and having for exemple each
gates represented by a function like "out = f(in)" each functions of the
simulated graph is in a library which is loaded dynamically. I can record a
run and then on new run I can selectively replace each libraries/functions
by another one with the same function contract but which instead of
computing the out value, it takes the value from the record. I can do it
like in the movie graph for each gates/functions.
Then it seems that means in the end the consciousness has to supervene on
the record... then it is the same conclusion than for physical
supervenience. What is wrong ?
Regards,
Quentin
--
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Jan 28 2009 - 12:33:50 PST