Hi Bruno,
> I don't understand what you mean by computations being infinitely far
> away. In the UD deployment, which I will wrote UD*, all computations
> begins soon or later (like all dominoes falls soon or later in the
> infinite discrete dominoe-sequences). All computations reach any of
> their relative computational state soon or later always after the UD
> makes a finite number of steps.
snip
> Hmmm... The phrasing "reconstitution at infinity" does not make sense,
> I think. All reconstitutions are done after a finite number of steps
> of the UD. But you are right that for (the third person description)
> of the first person probable experience we have to take into account
> the infinite union of the computations going through the relevant
> state. The reals appears here and now, because they are generated at
> the limit, as a infinite union of finite computations, or finite
> pieces of infinite computations.
snip
> OK. But it is the union which is infinite. The reconstitution can be
> numbered (by a God).
Yes, I see we agree - my fault. I meant the infinite union of
computations - maybe "rec. at infinity" was a bit dramatic way of
speaking - the way you put it is clearer.
Cheers,
Günther
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Jan 10 2009 - 08:31:10 PST