Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

From: Kim Jones <kimjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:12:14 +1100

On 10/01/2009, at 6:37 PM, Brent Meeker wrote:

> The question is how is the simulated observer made conscious of the
> passage of
> (simulated) time. If you just look a momentary machine states,
> ignoring their
> causal/temporal relations, how will they create the consciousness of
> time in the
> simulated observer?
>
> Brent


But does it make any difference whether the observer is simulated or
not? I've been assuming all along that my "reality" might be a
"simulated" one from your POV. You could (without me knowing for sure
but perhaps suspecting it) be projecting my entire reality for my (and
almost certainly, your) benefit. Without you fiddling the knobs and
faders behind the scenes I don't even exist.

Time exists where the conscious mind attributes or senses "meaning".
Because everything can ultimately be derived from everything else, it
makes sense that time is like a kind of "white noise of meaning" of
all perceived OMs.


If that isn't too Shirley McLaine



regards,


Kim

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Jan 10 2009 - 03:12:22 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST