Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

From: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:37:45 -0800

Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> 2009/1/10 Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>:
>
>>> Consider a simulation of an observer watching a falling stone, running
>>> on a digital computer. Does the observer have any way of knowing
>>> whether the simulation is being run serially, in parallel, on how many
>>> and what kinds of physical machines, at what speed, or in what order?
>>>
>>>
>> Is the observer conscious of a passage to time?
>
> Yes,but of course it won't be real or external time of which he will
> be conscious. In a block universe, there isn't necessarily any real or
> external time. Whether you call the internal time of the simulation or
> block universe "real" is a matter of taste.
>

The question is how is the simulated observer made conscious of the passage of
(simulated) time. If you just look a momentary machine states, ignoring their
causal/temporal relations, how will they create the consciousness of time in the
simulated observer?

Brent

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Jan 10 2009 - 02:37:57 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST