Re: MGA for DUMMIES

From: Colin Hales <c.hales.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:25:02 +1100

Hi,
Computationalsim pronounced dead here:
Bringsjord, S. (1999). The Zombie Attack on the Computational Conception
of Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LIX(1), 41-69.
cheers
colin


Kim Jones wrote:
> A representation of a thing (say MGA) is as good (ie as authentic) as
> the thing being represented.
>
> Yes?
>
> Autrement dit:
>
>
> there is no especial difference between the movie and the subject (of
> the movie) - where the movie is a more or less "complete" (whatever
> that means) representation of the subject
>
>
> I have always FELT this to be true
>
> Guys,
>
>
> There is a great need to SIMPLIFY all this stuff for dummies like me
>
>
> Somebody please write "The Dummie's Guide to the Computationalist
> Hypothesis"
>
>
> You stand to make beaucoup de fric
>
>
> K
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Nov 29 2008 - 20:23:25 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST