A representation of a thing (say MGA) is as good (ie as authentic) as
the thing being represented.
Yes?
Autrement dit:
there is no especial difference between the movie and the subject (of
the movie) - where the movie is a more or less "complete" (whatever
that means) representation of the subject
I have always FELT this to be true
Guys,
There is a great need to SIMPLIFY all this stuff for dummies like me
Somebody please write "The Dummie's Guide to the Computationalist
Hypothesis"
You stand to make beaucoup de fric
K
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Nov 28 2008 - 04:51:51 PST