Oops.
to finish...
For all devices x,
if x is complex is some sense then x is conscious in some (possibly other)
sense.
In other words, for all devices x, (a) -logically entails- (b):
(a) there is a partition D_t of t such that T(x; R, D_t) = 1
(b) there is a partition (D_t)' of t such that T(x; C, (D_t)') = 1.
Basically, when I continue my so called algebraic physics paper, I will
probably see how far I can get by not defining C. I do at least have a
notion for R: it will be a standardized measure of pseudo-randomness or
complexity that at least fairly measures all devices and has no bias....
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Brian Tenneson <tennesb.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
What I mean here can be stated now:
Let R be a device measure pertaining to complexity, such as akin Kolomogorov
complexity and C be a to-be-determined device measure about consciousness.
For all devices x,
if T(x; R, D_t) = 1, for some D_t, THEN
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed May 14 2008 - 11:55:40 PDT