Re: All feedback appreciated - An introduction to Algebraic Physics

From: Brian Tenneson <>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 08:55:32 -0700


to finish...
For all devices x,
if x is complex is some sense then x is conscious in some (possibly other)

 In other words, for all devices x, (a) -logically entails- (b):
(a) there is a partition D_t of t such that T(x; R, D_t) = 1
(b) there is a partition (D_t)' of t such that T(x; C, (D_t)') = 1.

Basically, when I continue my so called algebraic physics paper, I will
probably see how far I can get by not defining C. I do at least have a
notion for R: it will be a standardized measure of pseudo-randomness or
complexity that at least fairly measures all devices and has no bias....

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Brian Tenneson <> wrote:
What I mean here can be stated now:
Let R be a device measure pertaining to complexity, such as akin Kolomogorov
complexity and C be a to-be-determined device measure about consciousness.
For all devices x,
  if T(x; R, D_t) = 1, for some D_t, THEN

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Wed May 14 2008 - 11:55:40 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST