Re: assumptions

From: Bruno Marchal <>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:32:27 +0100

Le 21-févr.-08, à 15:01, Lennart Nilsson a écrit :

> Oh, I am very much proEverett and proDeutsch and, I might add
> proStandish
> (having translated his book Theory of Nothing into swedish). And you
> are
> right of course, it was your assumptions I questioned...

OK, and I said : "No problem then", because (as a logician perhaps) I
seldomly discuss assumptions.

But still, although I agree with Mirek that comp (as I define it, i.e.
CT + "yes doctor") is a very strong hypothesis, the negation of it is
also quite strong, if not stronger. For believing in non-comp, you have
to believe in actual physical infinities and/or in genuine third person
indeterminacy (like copenhagen and anti-everettist). You could perhaps
elaborate abit, if you have the time.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Wed Feb 27 2008 - 09:33:16 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST