- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>

Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:55:14 -0500

Hi John and Tom:

Below is a first try at a more precise expression of my current model.

1) Assume [A-Inf] - a complete, divisible ensemble of A-Inf that

contains its own divisions.

2) [N(i):E(i)] are two component divisions of [A-Inf] where i is an

index [as are j, k, p, r, t, v, and z below] and the N(i) are empty

of any [A-Inf] and the E(i) contain all of [A-Inf].

{Therefore [A-Inf] is a member of itself, and i ranges from 1 to infinity}

3) S(j) are divisions of [A-Inf] that are not empty of [A-Inf].

{Somethings}

4) Q(k) are divisions of [A-Inf] that are not empty of [A-Inf].

{Questions}

5) mQ(p) intersect S(p).

{mQ(p) are meaningful questions for S(p)}

6) umQ(r) should intersect S(r) but do not, or should intersect N(r)

but can not.

{umQ(r) are un-resolvable meaningful questions}.

7) Duration is a umQ(t) for N(t) and makes N(t) unstable so it

eventually spontaneously becomes S(t).

{This umQ(t) bootstraps time.}

8) Duration can be a umQ(v) for S(v) and if so makes S(v) unstable so

it eventually spontaneously becomes S(v+1)

{Progressive resolution of umQ, evolution.}

9) S(v) can have a simultaneous multiplicity of umQ(v).

{prediction}

10) S(v+1) is always greater than S(v) regarding its content of [A-Inf].

{progressive resolution of incompleteness} {Dark energy?} {evolution}

11) S(v+1) need not resolve [intersct with] all umQ(v) of S(v) and

can have new umQ(v+1).

{randomness, developing filters[also 8,9,10,11], creativity, that

is the unexpected, variation.}

12) S(z) can be divisible.

13) Some S(z) divisions can have observer properties [also S

itself??]: Aside from the above the the S(v) to S(v+1) transition can

include shifting intersections among S subdivisions that is

communication, and copying.

Perhaps one could call [A-Inf] All Information.

Well its a first try.

Hal Ruhl

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en

-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Received on Sat Feb 09 2008 - 22:57:11 PST

Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:55:14 -0500

Hi John and Tom:

Below is a first try at a more precise expression of my current model.

1) Assume [A-Inf] - a complete, divisible ensemble of A-Inf that

contains its own divisions.

2) [N(i):E(i)] are two component divisions of [A-Inf] where i is an

index [as are j, k, p, r, t, v, and z below] and the N(i) are empty

of any [A-Inf] and the E(i) contain all of [A-Inf].

{Therefore [A-Inf] is a member of itself, and i ranges from 1 to infinity}

3) S(j) are divisions of [A-Inf] that are not empty of [A-Inf].

{Somethings}

4) Q(k) are divisions of [A-Inf] that are not empty of [A-Inf].

{Questions}

5) mQ(p) intersect S(p).

{mQ(p) are meaningful questions for S(p)}

6) umQ(r) should intersect S(r) but do not, or should intersect N(r)

but can not.

{umQ(r) are un-resolvable meaningful questions}.

7) Duration is a umQ(t) for N(t) and makes N(t) unstable so it

eventually spontaneously becomes S(t).

{This umQ(t) bootstraps time.}

8) Duration can be a umQ(v) for S(v) and if so makes S(v) unstable so

it eventually spontaneously becomes S(v+1)

{Progressive resolution of umQ, evolution.}

9) S(v) can have a simultaneous multiplicity of umQ(v).

{prediction}

10) S(v+1) is always greater than S(v) regarding its content of [A-Inf].

{progressive resolution of incompleteness} {Dark energy?} {evolution}

11) S(v+1) need not resolve [intersct with] all umQ(v) of S(v) and

can have new umQ(v+1).

{randomness, developing filters[also 8,9,10,11], creativity, that

is the unexpected, variation.}

12) S(z) can be divisible.

13) Some S(z) divisions can have observer properties [also S

itself??]: Aside from the above the the S(v) to S(v+1) transition can

include shifting intersections among S subdivisions that is

communication, and copying.

Perhaps one could call [A-Inf] All Information.

Well its a first try.

Hal Ruhl

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en

-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Received on Sat Feb 09 2008 - 22:57:11 PST

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST
*