Re: Asifism revisited.

From: Torgny Tholerus <>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:41:20 +0200
Bruno Marchal skrev:
Le 05-juil.-07, à 14:19, Torgny Tholerus wrote:
David Nyman skrev:
You have however drawn our attention to something very interesting and
important IMO.  This concerns the necessary entailment of 'existence'.
1.  The relation 1+1=2 is always true.  It is true in all universes.
Even if a universe does not contain any humans or any observers.  The
truth of 1+1=2 is independent of all observers.

I agree with you (despite a notion as "universe" is not primitive in my 
opinion, unless you mean it a bit like the logician's notion of model 
perhaps). As David said, this is arithmetical realism.

Yes, you can see a universe as the same thing as a model.

When you have a (finite) set of rules, you will always get a universe from that set of rules, by just applying those rules an unlimited number of times.  And the result of these rules is existing, in the same way as our universe is existing.

Our universe is the result of some set of rules.  The interesting thing is to discover the specific rules that span our universe.

Torgny Tholerus

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Received on Mon Jul 09 2007 - 11:41:36 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST