Re: Information content of multiverse

From: Jason <jasonresch.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:37:23 -0000

On Jul 9, 1:39 am, "Mohsen Ravanbakhsh" <ravanbak....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> While I was reading the previous discussion; "justifying theory of
> everything" , I thought of my recent problem with still imperfection of our
> TOE. The problem is:
> Multiverse by itself is a choice, and every choice by it's nature has some
> bias and information.
> I could just consider two mathematical universes without any bias; the first
> is nothing or mathematical point. The second one is a whole, I mean a full
> space in infinite dimensions(just extending the perfect circle of Plato to
> remove it's bias in radius and dimension)
> Any other universe should contain a choice, including the collection of all
> possible universes! Why?
> Consider ME! Why 'I' am in this special world and not the other one? You
> might claim that I'm in the other ones as well. But I would still insist;
> 'Why 'I' am in this special universe and not the other?'. I hope you get my
> point.

Would you know the difference if you were in all other universes at
once? What about existing in every point of time that spans your
life, would you not still have the illusion of only existing in the
present?

> I wanted to conclude from this, even if there is a multiverse there's an
> information content for whole universe, and that might need another cause.
>

>From my understanding of Theory of Nothing, the set of all
descriptions for every possible universe requires zero bits of
information to describe when taken as a whole. However with observers
there is discrimination within this set of descriptions, observers
determine which are perceived as real and due to this discrimination
individual universes requiring massive amounts of information to
describe emerge from a set that takes nothing to describe. The large
amount of information required to describe what we observe is due to
fact that what is observed in any particular observer moment is
finite, therefore requiring some information to define its bounds.

I hope I have understood that part correctly; if not Russell can
correct me.

Jason


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Mon Jul 09 2007 - 03:37:32 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST