Re: Statistical Measure, does it matter?

From: John Mikes <jamikes.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:03:02 -0400

On 3/28/07, Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 26-mars-07, à 01:34, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
>
> > Standard computationalism is just the theory that your brain could be
> > replaced with an appropriately configured digital computer and you
> > would not only act the same, you would also feel the same. Bruno goes
> > on to show that this entails there is no separate physical reality by
> > means of the UDA, but we can still talk about computationalism - the
> > predominant theory in cognitive science - without discussing the UDA.
>
>
> Yes. And I intervene only when I find a contradiction between what is
> said, with the consequence of the UDA.
> I am also open to criticism of the UDA itself.
>
>
>
>
> > And in any case, the ideas Brent and I have been discussing are still
> > relevant if computationalism is wrong and (again a separate matter)
> > there is only one universe.
>
>
> Certainly.
>
>
> Bruno
>
>
> Then comes my ceterum censeo (applicable to the entire discussion) after
Bruno's Certainly : -- AS FAR AS WE KNOW --(today).
John

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Mar 28 2007 - 11:03:12 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST