Re: Statistical Measure, does it matter?

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:27:40 +0200

Le 26-mars-07, à 01:34, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :

> Standard computationalism is just the theory that your brain could be
> replaced with an appropriately configured digital computer and you
> would not only act the same, you would also feel the same. Bruno goes
> on to show that this entails there is no separate physical reality by
> means of the UDA, but we can still talk about computationalism - the
> predominant theory in cognitive science - without discussing the UDA.


Yes. And I intervene only when I find a contradiction between what is
said, with the consequence of the UDA.
I am also open to criticism of the UDA itself.




> And in any case, the ideas Brent and I have been discussing are still
> relevant if computationalism is wrong and (again a separate matter)
> there is only one universe.


Certainly.


Bruno


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Mar 28 2007 - 06:27:46 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST