I looked at your paper, interesting.
One question:
what do you mean by "exist"
(Notably: "does NOT exist)?
We think about it (no matter in how vague terms and weak understanding), we talk about it, our mind has a place in our thinking for that term, - does this not suffice for (in a WIDER??? meaning) existence?
I agree: it is logically (physically?) hardly identifiable but do we stand only on a (material?) physical basis?
And I make no difference between infinite small and infinite big. None of them understandable. Brent's 'infinitesimal' is a good idea in this topic, yet I consider it scale-oriented, an infinitesimally close in 1000 orders of magnitude smaller scale can be 'miles' away. (No 'real' miles implied) -
Best regards
John M
----- Original Message -----
From: Torgny Tholerus
To: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: Evidence for the simulation argument
Le 14-mars-07, à 08:51, Torgny Tholerus a écrit : (among others)
Infinity is a logically impossible concept. Infinity Does Not Exist.
--
Torgny Tholerus
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Mar 15 2007 - 15:49:29 PDT