RE: ASSA and Many-Worlds

From: Stathis Papaioannou <>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:25:26 +1100

Hal Ruhl writes:
> Hi Bruno:> > I do not think I fully understand what you are saying.> > Suppose your model bans white rabbits from its > evolving universes - meaning I take it that all > successive states are fully logical consequences of their prior state.
You mean "physical consequences" or something similar, don't you? I don't see anything logically inconsistent about a talking white rabbit or even the atoms of my keyboard reassembling themselves into a fire-breathing dragon.
Stathis Papaioannou
> I would see this as a selection of one possibility from two.> > Lets us say that you are correct about this > result re your model, this just seems to > reinforce the idea that it is a sub set in order > to avoid the information generating selection in the full set.> > Yours> > Hal Ruhl> > > At 11:30 AM 2/5/2007, you wrote:> > > >Le 05-févr.-07, à 00:46, Hal Ruhl a écrit :> >> > > As far as I can tell from this, my model may include Bruno's model as> > > a subset.> >> >> >This means that even if "my theory" makes disappear all (1-person)> >white rabbits, you will still have to justify that your overset does> >not reintroduce new one.> >> >Bruno> >> >> >> >> >> >> > _________________________________________________________________
Get the new Windows Live Messenger!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Mon Feb 05 2007 - 23:25:32 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST