>
> Listen, people, I don't belief you can keep talking about worlds and
> observers without using a minimal amount of MODAL LOGIC.
> I told you that before.
>
> For exemple, I wanted to make remarks on the "cul-de-sac" thread, but
> I have abandon the idea because without MODAL LOGIC the post would
> have to be much too long.
Fair enough. Modal logic is where I lost you in your thesis -
hopefully I will time to read your suggested introductory book on it.
>
> More generaly we should perhaps agree on a little set of fundamental
> books
> to work with as a solid base for our evolving discussion.
>
> Here is my suggestion:
>
> 1) The MWI of QM (Dewitt and Graham).
> 2) Mmmmh... I will think about a good and simple book on modal logic ...
> I think CHELLAS' book (I mention it before) is the best one.
> 3) I wait for your suggestions ... we should not propose more than 5
> books!
>
I would add Deutsch's Foundations of Reality. It has some particularly
pertinent comments on Solipsism and on the Free Will vs Determinism issue.
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit,
University of NSW Phone 9385 6967
Sydney 2052 Fax 9385 6965
Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre
http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Oct 04 1999 - 22:44:01 PDT