Re: Natural Order & Belief

From: John M <>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:49:33 -0500

I enjoy your (Brent, Bruno, etc.) religion-class.<G>
What you quoted about prayer, is in the ballpark of what I say always,
except for the addition: 'does what was to be done anyway'. IOW: he doesn't
Why do the religions (almost all of them) depict a god after the worst human
characters: jealous, flatterable, requiring praise and blind obedience,
vengeful, irate, picking favorites,
even sadistic and not caring? Why does he punish for deeds done exactly as
he created the sinner? Why is he said to have created this miserable
creature 'homo' after his own image?
This prompted my debate-argument against(?) the Intelligent Design ever
since "ID" showed up, as:
1. a design does nothing and is not intelligent, it is a manual how
to do a job,
    the designer may be intelligent, but who does the job? A
blueprint (ID) does nothing.
2. The world is evil, made so that creatures eat up others, pain,
torture, lies, greed, SM, exploitation, etc. etc. so it is more likely
that it is the handiwork of the 'devil'. Anyway: Lucipher
means the one who brings the light (photon, energy, existence) -
Never mind theism or deism.
    THEN we are created in the image of the devil. Closer.

(Carl Sagan was more benevolent: in Cosmos he wrote that the world is the
test-work of a 'demiurg', who failed - and it was let running so the others
see how NOT to do it.)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stathis Papaioannou" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:05 AM
Subject: RE: Natural Order & Belief

Brent Meeker writes:

> You mean like this:

That reference has an interesting take on prayer:

"In hearing our prayer God does not change His will or action in our regard,
but simply puts into effect what He had eternally decreed in view of our

In other words, prayer doesn't make a difference because will do what
he was going to do anyway. Moreover:

"Indeed, so numerous and so helpful are these effects of prayer that they
compensate us, even when the special object of our prayer is not granted.
Often they are of far greater benefit than what we ask for. Nothing that we
might obtain in answer to our prayer could exceed in value the familiar
converse with God in which prayer consists.

The author seems to be implicitly aware of the empirical challenge presented
by all the unanswered prayers. By this process, theism is watered down until
it looks much like deism, the position of most modern theologians with a
philosophical education, which excludes the fundamentalists who believe in
literal truth of their religious books.

Stathis Papaioannou

 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Sat Nov 18 2006 - 15:50:04 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST