Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 21-oct.-06, à 21:52, Charles Goodwin a écrit :
>
> > [mailto:Fabric-of-Reality.domain.name.hidden] On Behalf Of Peter D
> > Jones
> >
> >> The problem is not that there are no such resemblances in a
> >> Multiverse, it is that ther are far too many. How does one
> >> distinguishing "real" ones from "coincidental" ones. How does a Harry
> >> Potter film differ from a documentary?
> >
> > The only way I know of that the MWI distinguishes these is that the
> > "measure" of the "real ones" is Vastly larger than the "measure" of the
> > rest. But that is just restating things.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Except, I would say that QM-without-collapse + decoherence theory
> explains the measure of the real one is vaster than the measure of the
> Harry-Potter (HP) stories, and, as DD said himself, why the probability
> to remains in a Harry Potter story is negligible.
In Barbour-style theories, every Now (3D configuration of matter) is
exemplified exactly once.
> In a a-la-Feynman nutshell: QM entails a phase randomization making the
> HP story amplitude of probabilities self-destroying.
That's multiversal, not omniversal.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Oct 22 2006 - 11:53:49 PDT