Re: The difference between a 'chair' concept and a 'mathematical concept' ;)

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:18:15 +0200

Le 10-oct.-06, à 03:52, Russell Standish a écrit :

>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 10:35:05AM -0700, 1Z wrote:
>>
>> The idea that materialism is not compatible with computationalism
>> is a bold and startling claim.
>
> Materialism comes in a couple of different flavours. The one that COMP
> is incompatible with is "eliminative materialism", also sometimes
> known as physicalism.


Comp has indeed be shown to be incompatible with physicalism (the
doctrine that physics is the fundamental science).
But physicalism is not necessarily eliminativist. Most physicalist
believes in consciousness, even if they believe that consciousness
emerges from the behavior of some putative "matter".
Eliminative materialist does not believe in consciousness or first
person at all. Some says this explicitly, others are unclear or just
incoherent.

Comp is not incompatible with the existence of primary or primitive
matter, but the UDA shows that comp has to be incompatible with any
relation between that matter and the *appearance* of matter or of
physical laws; making matter and material universe(s) as useless as
invisible horse pulling cars.


Bruno


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Oct 10 2006 - 08:18:36 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST