Re: Reality, the bogus nature of the Turing test

From: 1Z <peterdjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:05:14 -0700

Russell Standish wrote:

> The Nothing itself does not have any properties in itself to speak
> of. Rather it is the PROJECTION postulate that means we can treat it
> as the set of all strings, from which any conscious viewpoint must
> correspond to a subset of strings.

That sounds rather like the Somethingist principle that only certain
possibilites
are selected for the Privilege of Actuallity.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Sep 24 2006 - 11:06:14 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST