Re: computationalism and supervenience

From: 1Z <>
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 15:41:14 -0700

Brent Meeker wrote:

> I think we need to say what it means for a computation to be self-interpreting.

Only if we have reaoxn to think all computations need inteprretation.
However, if interpretation can be reduced to computation
(rather than vice-versa) that is not a problem.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Sat Sep 09 2006 - 19:06:36 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST