Re: computationalism and supervenience

From: 1Z <peterdjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 15:41:14 -0700

Brent Meeker wrote:

> I think we need to say what it means for a computation to be self-interpreting.

Only if we have reaoxn to think all computations need inteprretation.
However, if interpretation can be reduced to computation
(rather than vice-versa) that is not a problem.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Sep 09 2006 - 19:06:36 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST