Brent Meeker writes:
> > The actual physical process becomes almost irrelevant. In the limiting case, all of the 
> > computation is contained in the manual, the physical existence of which makes no 
> > difference to whether or not the computation is implemented, since it makes no difference 
> > to the actual physical activity of the system and the theory under consideration is that 
> > consciousness supervenes on this physical activity. If we get rid of the qualifier "almost" 
> > the result is close to Bruno's theory, according to which the physical activity is irrelevant 
> > and the computation is "run" by virtue of its status as a Platonic object. As I understand 
> > it, Bruno arrives at this idea because it seems less absurd than the idea that consciousness 
> > supervenes on any and every physical process, while Maudlin finds both ideas absurd and 
> > thinks there is something wrong with computationalism.
> 
> As I understand your argument, the manual doesn't have to be a one-to-one translator 
> of states, and so it can "translate" from the null event to any string whatsoever. 
> So the physical event is irrelevant.
That's right, the physical event is irrelevant, except that I can't quite see how to eliminate the 
idea that "some physical object/process/universe exists" on which everything else can be hung. 
FWIW, I actully think this idea is an argument against computationalism, even though I still think 
it is the best theory of mind that we have.
Stathis Papaioannou
_________________________________________________________________
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Sep 09 2006 - 00:47:56 PDT