RE: Bruno's argument - Comp

From: W. C. <>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:28:44 +0800

>From: Brent Meeker

>I don't think it's possible, because "perfect" is subjective. Perfect for
>the lion is bad for the antelope.

Such problem doesn't exist in PU.
In PU, there is no food chain like "A eats B; B eats C; C eats D ... etc.".
Perfect beings (both living and non-living) mean no unhappiness (you don't
feel happy when you are eaten, right?).
Why living beings need to eat?
People with common intelligence can easily *imagine* (or dream) what a PU
will be.
The difficult thing is how to make it.
(The rule is always simple: If I can't make it, it's just dream.)



Get 10Mb extra storage for MSN Hotmail. Subscribe Now!

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Sun Aug 06 2006 - 21:30:46 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST