>From: Brent Meeker
>I don't think it's possible, because "perfect" is subjective. Perfect for
>the lion is bad for the antelope.
>
Such problem doesn't exist in PU.
In PU, there is no food chain like "A eats B; B eats C; C eats D ... etc.".
Perfect beings (both living and non-living) mean no unhappiness (you don't
feel happy when you are eaten, right?).
Why living beings need to eat?
People with common intelligence can easily *imagine* (or dream) what a PU
will be.
The difficult thing is how to make it.
(The rule is always simple: If I can't make it, it's just dream.)
Thanks.
WC.
_________________________________________________________________
Get 10Mb extra storage for MSN Hotmail. Subscribe Now!
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-hk
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Aug 06 2006 - 21:30:46 PDT