Re: K the Master Set (+ partial answer to Tom's Diagonalization)

From: George Levy <>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:32:58 -0700

Hi Bruno

Each one of us like to do what we do best and we apply our preferred
techniques to the problem at hand. Thus a mechanic may solve the
pollution problem by building electric cars, and the cook may solve the
same problem by preparing vegetarian meals.

As a mathematician you are trying to compose a theory of everything
using mathematics, this is understandable, and you came up with COMP
which is strongly rooted in mathematics and logic.

I came up independently with my own concept involving a generalization
of relativity to information theory ( my background is
engineering/physics) and somehow we seem to agree on many points.
Unfortunately I do not have the background and the time to give my ideas
a formal background. It is just an engineering product and it feels right.

I believe that what you are saying is right, however I am having some
trouble following you, just like Norman Samish said. It would help if
you outlined a roadmap. Then we would be able to follow the roadmap
without having to stop and admire the mathematical scenery at every turn
even though it is very beautiful to the initiated, I am sure. For
example you could use several levels of explanation: a first level would
be as if your were talking to your grandmother; a second level, talking
to your kids (if they listen); a last level, talking to your colleagues.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Tue Jul 18 2006 - 18:34:10 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST