Hi Bruno
Each one of us like to do what we do best and we apply our preferred
techniques to the problem at hand. Thus a mechanic may solve the
pollution problem by building electric cars, and the cook may solve the
same problem by preparing vegetarian meals.
As a mathematician you are trying to compose a theory of everything
using mathematics, this is understandable, and you came up with COMP
which is strongly rooted in mathematics and logic.
I came up independently with my own concept involving a generalization
of relativity to information theory ( my background is
engineering/physics) and somehow we seem to agree on many points.
Unfortunately I do not have the background and the time to give my ideas
a formal background. It is just an engineering product and it feels right.
I believe that what you are saying is right, however I am having some
trouble following you, just like Norman Samish said. It would help if
you outlined a roadmap. Then we would be able to follow the roadmap
without having to stop and admire the mathematical scenery at every turn
even though it is very beautiful to the initiated, I am sure. For
example you could use several levels of explanation: a first level would
be as if your were talking to your grandmother; a second level, talking
to your kids (if they listen); a last level, talking to your colleagues.
George
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Jul 18 2006 - 18:34:10 PDT