Hi,
1Z wrote:
> I will take the stuff that seems solid to me as primary reality until
> demostrated
> otherwise.
This was not the point... the point was to make you understand that
Bruno has proved that *IF* computationalism is true *THEN* primary
reality does not exists ! It even doesn't mean anything in this
context.
So the point is not that you accept or not computationalism and
stuffy/not stuffy stuff... It is just that if you accept
computationalism you cannot accept a primary reality... If you do not
(as it seems) then it's normal, but you cannot claim computationalism
at the same time, Bruno proved that it is not compatible.
Regards,
Quentin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Jul 12 2006 - 17:41:24 PDT