SV: SV: Only logic is necessary?

From: Lennart Nilsson <lennartn.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:11:08 +0200

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
[mailto:everything-list.domain.name.hidden] För Brent Meeker
Skickat: den 10 juli 2006 23:04
Till: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
Ämne: Re: SV: Only logic is necessary?

I'd say the decision to use classical logic is an
assumption that you're applying it to sentences or propositions where it
will work (i.e. declarative, timeless sentences), not an assumption about
logic. Same for geometry. I use
Euclidean geometry to calculate distances in my backyard, I use spherical
geometry to calculate
air-miles to nearby airports, I use WGS84 to calculate distance between
naval vessels at sea.

Brent Meeker

Cooper says that all sentences have substans. The logic asumption is that
there are some that have not and are timless.

LN



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Jul 11 2006 - 03:12:16 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST