Re: SV: Only logic is necessary?

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:20:02 +0200

Le 09-juil.-06, à 14:21, Lennart Nilsson a écrit :

> This is precisely the notion Cooper undermines in his book...


Note that comp makes already logic a branch of biology, but then
biology is a branch of psychology/theology itself branch of number
theory. See perhaps my paper "amoeba, planaria and dreaming machines".
I don't insist on this for not looking too much provocative. With the
Fi I will have the occasion to explain an abstract theory of
self-reproduction, and self-transformation, and then shows that logic
appears as an internal representation of those self-transformation.
I really come from biology myself (my first bible has been "Molecular
biology of the gene" by J.D. Watson.
Perhaps I would be able to defend Cooper if the context was not that
apparently most current scientist takes "Nature" and "Matter" as
granted ... since Aristotle reification of primary matter.

Bruno

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Mon Jul 10 2006 - 08:21:18 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST