Re: Only Existence is necessary?

From: George Levy <glevy.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 19:58:35 -0700

Stephen Paul King wrote:

>little discussion has
>been given to the implications of taking the 1st person aspect as primary or
>fundamental. Could you point me toward any that you have seen?
>
>

Hi Stephen

Alas, I am a mere engineer, not a philosopher. The only author I can
point you to is John Locke who I was told had some view similar to the
ones I expressed. I have formed my opinions mostly independently in the
process of writing a book (unpublished :'( ) I think that science is
moving gradually toward first person - starting with Galileo's
relativity, then Einstein's relativity and finally with QM (MWI). As
science had progressed, the observer has acquired a greater and greater
importance. Extrapolating to the limit, "I" becomes central and its
existence anthropically defines (creates) the world where it resides.

George

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Jul 09 2006 - 22:59:47 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST