Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Hi Norman,
>
> Le 20-juin-06, à 04:04, Norman Samish a écrit :
>
>
> I've endured this thread long enough! Let's get back to something
> I can understand!
>
My background is more engineering and physics than mathematics and I do
share some of Norman misgivings. Some of it has to do with terminology.
For example the term "COMP hypothesis" does not carry any information.
Would it be more appropriate to rename it as an invariance, equivalence
or conservation law? For example would it be appropriate to call it
"invariance of consciousness with (change in physical) substrate?"
George
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Jul 05 2006 - 14:37:07 PDT