Hi,
Le Mercredi 5 Avril 2006 22:07, John M a écrit :
> Stephen:
>
> right on! (onwards, of course).
> I did not mention the arts. Express "art" by numbers
> and you killed the art.
It is not a question to describe art by numbers... I'd say it is totally
unrelated, in a materialistic view don't you think you would kill the art by
describing it at molecular interaction level ?
The only problem I have with this idea (numbers...) is like I said in the
other mail I don't understand where *meaning* come from. We can
encode "information" in numbers, but without an observer/person (as Tom said)
the information is meaningless... yet Tom said a person is an higher level
system. Hmmm so numbers are the primary things that generates person that
generates meaning which generates numbers ? (I hope I'm not to unclear)
Quentin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Apr 05 2006 - 16:36:25 PDT