Re: Numbers

From: John M <jamikes.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 07:43:00 -0700 (PDT)

--- 1Z <peterdjones.domain.name.hidden> wrote:

>...
>
> >Two centuries ago, people weren't able to figure
> > out *how* complex living beings could have emerged
> from simple
> > and inert matter and they thought too that this
> was impossible
> > and that they had to choose another default
> "explanation".
>
> Two centuries ago people thought they could build
> perpetual motion
> machines
> and square the circle. There is no guarantee that
> things we cannot
> figure out now
> will be figured out in the future.
>
Pter, to 'figure out' that something which was an idea
in the past is not really among the presently existing
"all possible" cases - (right or wrong)
IS a valid way of "figuring out'.
It still may be an insufficent basis for a decision.
Postpone final judgement to the time when we achieved
'omniscience'.

Humbly yours

John M

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Apr 02 2006 - 10:44:03 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST