Le 25-mars-06, à 19:10, 1Z a écrit :
> The
> Searlian point is that there is something about the actual, concrete
> non-abstract existence/occurence of real physical processes that
> explains the hard problems (IOW, "physics" in the sense of "territory",
> not "map").
Searles is notoriously invalid in his conclusions, as I tend to think
Hofstadter and Dennett Made clear. (And then the UDA is far more
devastating than their argument).
When you say yes to the doctor you already believed that a piece of the
(mind) territory is relatively captured by a map. An artificial brain
is not just a model, in that perspective.
Comp does not explain everything, but it makes many problem at least
formulable, and then partial solution arise.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Mar 25 2006 - 13:22:18 PST