Re: Numbers

From: 1Z <peterdjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:38:24 -0800

Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> A quick point still :
> You seem to have a problem with mathematical monism and reject it due to HP
> world... but HP world is not a consequence of mathematical monism, but a
> consequence of many world theories which can themself presuppose mathematical
> monism or not. Everett many world theory is not mathematical monism, still it
> support HP world.

Physically MW theories are inherently more constrained than
mathematical
MW theories. You are not going to get water flowing uphill in a
physical MW
theory, because it contradicts the consevation of energy. Plus physical
theories
have more resources available to explain why wrlds are separate and
non-interacting.
Finally, there is no particular reason why I have to support physical
MW theories either!


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Mar 24 2006 - 14:39:26 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST