Re: Numbers

From: Quentin Anciaux <quentin.anciaux.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:46:06 +0100

Le Jeudi 23 Mars 2006 22:39, 1Z a écrit :
> chales1.domain.name.hidden wrote:
> > He has proven beyond doubt, using Godellian arguments, that some numbers
> > or intrinsically random .ie. that there is NO formulaic prescription that
> > will reach that number from any starting point.
>
> If Mathematical Platonism is true, they exist anyway !
>
> What is not clear is why equations are important. Phsyics uses them,
> but
> physics is based on the idea that some logivally possible laws are
> real and others aren't, not on the idea that everymathemtical object
> is equally real.

I disagree, physics is based on the idea that the world we *perceive* is
predictable/understandable. As you are *not* in every mathematical object,
you can't perceive more than the world you are embedded into. That doesn't
mean other "laws" could not rule other "parallel" universes.

Quentin

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Mar 23 2006 - 17:46:22 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST