peterdjones.domain.name.hidden wrote:
>
> Georges Quénot wrote:
>
>> My 2. and 3. remain anyway.
>>
>> Georges.
>
> "2. There may well exist a "Harry Potter universe" that
> includes a counterpart of you but it is not causaly
> related to our universe (too far for instance) and
> this is why we cannot observe it. "
>
> The idea that some universes causally relate and others
> do not is a kind of physical law. But if every mathematical
> object is instantiated, evey mathematically describable physical law
> must be as well. So there must be universes, or rather sets of
> universes, in which the law about non interacting is false or
> works differently.
There might be universes interacting one with each other
(though from my viewpoint I would tend to consider a set
of interactive universes as a single universe) but it
might also be that the one in which we live is among
the ones that are not causally connected to any other.
And what about 3. ?
Georges.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Mar 19 2006 - 14:08:46 PST