Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Le 15-mars-06, à 17:51, Georges Quenot a écrit :
>
>>>> *If* comp is true. I am not sure of that.
>>> Me too. But it is the theory I am studying. Also comp provides some
>>> neat "etalon philosophy" to compare with other theories. The advantage
>>> of comp (which I recall includes Church thesis) is that, at least,
>>> many
>>> fundamental questions can be addressed.
>> Which one for instance (that is not addressed in the view of
>> the universe/multiverse as a mathematical object)?
>
> The relation between first and third person concepts. Comp allows (at
> least) and actually necessitates the use of theoretical computer
> science(s). It is a mine of interesting results. My work exploits many
> of them for the translation of the UD Argument in the language of the
> universal machine. Actually it is one of them, Godel's theorem, which
> convinces me of the possibility of the enterprise.
I am sorry. I don't see. What Comp can say about the relation
between first and third person concepts that could not be said
in a "simple" "mathematical-monism" context?
Georges.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Mar 19 2006 - 08:11:12 PST