Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

From: Norman Samish <>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:48:33 -0800

Thanks to all who replied to my question. This question has bothered me for years, and I have hopes that some progress can be made towards an answer.

I've heard some interesting concepts, including:
(1) "Numbers must exist, therefore 'something' must exist."
(2) "Something exists because Nothingness cannot non-Exist."

Perhaps the above two are equivalent.

With respect to (1) above, why must numbers exist?

With respect to (2) above, why can't "nothingness" exist? The trivial answer is that even "nothing" is "something." However, I don't think that this addresses the real question.

A state of pure "NO THING" would forbid even the existence of numbers, or of empty space, or of an empty set. It would be non-existence.

Non-existence seems so much simpler than the infinity of things, both material and immaterial, that surrounds us. So why are things here? (I'm grateful that they are, of course.)

Is this a self-consistent, if unanswerable, question?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Mon Mar 06 2006 - 14:49:43 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST