Norman wrote:
> I'm agnostic, yet it strikes me that even if  there
> is no God, those that decide to have faith,  and
> have the ability to have faith, in a benign  God
> have gained quite a bit.  They have faith in  an
> afterlife, in ultimate justice, in the triumph of  good
> over evil, etc.  Without this faith, life for  many would
> be intolerable.  
>
> If there is no God, there is no afterlife and they  get
> a zero.  If there is a God, there is an after  life and
> they get infinity.  So how can they  lose?  Maybe
> Pascal's Wager deserves more  consideration.
>
> Norman Samish
 
My opinion about Pascal's Wager is that we try to  compare things that we 
can't quantify or measure, or at least that we don't  know the relative measure 
of the things we are trying to compare.  It  involves betting on the existence 
of something infinite based on a  totally undefined probability distribution.  
I think that it is  indeterminate, like dividing zero by zero, or infinity by 
infinity.   However, I think this same mistake is done in talking about 
multiverses, too, as  I've brought up before.
 
Tom Caylor
 
Received on Thu Feb 02 2006 - 02:10:02 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST